Eesley Light & Power Co. v. Commonwealth Power Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Allegan; Padgham, J. Case by the Eesley Light & Power Company against the Commonwealth Power Company for negligent interference with plaintiff’s water rights. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
The plaintiff is a domestic corporation engaged in the generating and sale of electricity at Plain-well, Mich. It was admitted upon the trial that plaintiff since 1905 has been the owner of 2,266f square inches of water at the plaintiff’s tailrace, and had the right to use this water during the years from 1905 to May, 1910, the time of bringing this suit. It depends for the most part upon water power from the river to generate its electricity. Plaintiff has a steam plant to supplement the water power, when it is needed for any reason, and this steam plant is of sufficient capacity to supply…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Allison v. ChandlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
- Gilbert v. KennedyMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
- Mueller v. Bethesda Mineral Spring Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1891
- Gardiner v. CourtrightMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
- John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance v. MooreMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Fuentes v. TuckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- State v. McCarthySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
- Rowe v. RennickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- In Re Sprenger's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
- Ludwigsen v. LarsenMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.