Legal Opinion

Acadia, California, Ltd. v. Herbert

California Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1960No. L. A. 25140PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, C. J.

Plaintiffs, Acadia, California, Ltd., and Anthony Burke, brought this action for damages and for declaratory and injunctive relief, alleging that defendant had ceased to comply with two agreements under which he was obligated to supply them with water essential to the use of their lands and that his conduct was malicious. The jury, under instructions defining the meaning of the agreements, returned verdicts in favor of plaintiffs, awarding Acadia and Burke $5,753 and $8,000, respectively, as compensatory damages and $10,000 each as punitive damages. The court declared the rights of the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Sloane v. Southern California Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Kornoff v. Kingsburg Cotton Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Potter v. Pacific Coast Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Judson v. L.A. Suburban Gas Co.California Supreme Court · 1910
  5. McKune v. Santa Clara Valley Mill & Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1895

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Dillon v. LeggCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Crisci v. Security InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Potter v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.California Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Fletcher v. Western National Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. Farmers Group, Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API