Judson v. L.A. Suburban Gas Co.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.
This is an action for damages caused by an alleged nuisance and for its abatement. The action was dismissed as to defendants T. S. C. Lowe and Thaddeus Lowe. The California Coke and Gas Company answered the complaint herein, denying substantially all of its allegations, and E. E. Crandall, as receiver of the Los Angeles Suburban Gas Company, intervened and filed his answer. He does not appeal, however. Plaintiff recovered judgment for seven hundred and fifty dollars damages, and defendants were enjoined from maintaining the nuisance. This appeal is from the judgment and from the order denying…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Bohan v. Port Jervis Gaslight Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1890
- In Re SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Susquehanna Fertilizer Co. v. MaloneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1890
- Evans v. Reading Chemical Fertilizing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
- August Berger v. Minneapolis Gaslight Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Green v. General Petroleum Corp.California Supreme Court · 1928
- Lebrun v. RichardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Kornoff v. Kingsburg Cotton Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
- Acadia, California, Ltd. v. HerbertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Herzog v. GrossoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.