Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Rhodehamel

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 1912No. 10469PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Myers, J., entered November 27, 1911, in favor of the plaintiff, after an advisory verdict of a jury favorable to the defendant, in an action to foreclose a chattel mortgage.

1Opinion of the CourtChadwick, J.

In March, 1910, Adam Thompson, the plaintiff, was negotiating with the owners of a certain building in the city of Seattle for a lease of the upper floors of *25the building which was then occupied by him as a lodging house. He represented to defendant that he had a lease for the building. Accordingly defendant paid the sum of $50 to bind the bargain for the lodging house, and thereafter paid the sum of $750 upon the representation that plaintiff had a lease corresponding with a form exhibited to her at the time. Defendant at the same time executed notes aggregating $1,700, and secured the same…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Houser & Haines Manufacturing Co. v. McKayWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Freeman v. GloydWashington Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Eldridge v. Young America & Cliff Consolidated Mining Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. City of Tulsa v. WellsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Henderson CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  3. Schroeder v. Hotel Commercial Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Bayley v. LewisWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Advance-Rumely T. Co., Inc. v. WenholzMontana Supreme Court · 1927

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API