Legal Opinion
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Henderson County
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided June 12, 1923No. 986PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In 1919, Henderson county entered into a written contract with Williams, Burk Co., for the improvement of one of its public roads. The following provisions of the contract are material to the facts of this appeal:
"This agreement made this 29th day of December, 1919, by and between Henderson county, Tex., represented by the commissioners' court, party of the first part, and Willams, Burk Co., composed of J. P. Williams, T. J. Burk and W. W. Scarborough of Jacksonville, Tex., his their executor, administrators, heirs, successors or assigns, party of the second part; and subject to the approval…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Brogan v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Keokee Consolidated Coke Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Hess & Skinner Engineering Co. v. TurneyTexas Supreme Court · 1919
- American Surety Co. v. Lawrenceville Cement Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maine · 1901
- Kansas City ex rel. Kansas City Hydraulic Press Brick Co. v. YoumansSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Smith v. Texas Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1932
- Franzen v. Southern Surety Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1926
- U. S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Henderson CountyTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925
- Texas Co. v. SchriewerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
- Winder Brothers v. R. S. SterlingTexas Supreme Court · 1929
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.