Legal Opinion
In Re Firearm Cases
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 10, 2005No. A103211, A105309PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MARCHIANO, P. J.
A number of California cities and counties filed an action on behalf of the general public against manufacturers, distributors and retailers of handguns and their trade associations, asserting that their conduct of distributing firearms in a manner that enables criminals to acquire the firearms constituted a public nuisance and a pattern of unlawful, unfair and deceptive business acts and practices in violation of the unfair competition law (UCL), Business and Professions Code sections 17200 and 17500. On March 7, 2003, the superior court considered several separate…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
- Direct Sales Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Committee on Children's Television, Inc. v. General Foods Corp.California Supreme Court · 1983
- Ileto v. Glock Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Bardin v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2006
- Hall v. Time Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2008
- Ileto v. Glock, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Cattie v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2007
- Soto v. Bushmaster Firearms International, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2019
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.