Legal Opinion
Ileto v. Glock, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 11, 2009No. 06-56872, 07-15403, 07-15404PublishedCited by 100 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge GRABER; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge BERZON.
GRABER, Circuit Judge:
By enacting the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (“PLCAA” or “Act”), 15 U.S.C. §§ 7901-7903, Pub.L. No. 109-92, 119 Stat. 2095 (2005), Congress has protected 'federally licensed manufacturers and sellers of firearms from most civil liability for injuries independently and intentionally inflicted by criminals who use their non-defective products. Under the terms of the PLCAA, the claims brought here, by the victims of a criminal who shot them, against a federally licensed…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by100 opinions
- Silva v. Di VittorioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- In Re Bose Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Jordan Marks v. Crunch San Diego, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Lyon v. Chase Bank USA, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- The American Civil Liberties U v. Catherine MastoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.