Legal Opinion
Cattie v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided March 21, 2007No. 06CV0897-LAB (CAB)PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS
BURNS, District Judge.
On June 9, 2006, Plaintiff filed her second amended complaint (“SAC”) 1 in this putative class action. On June 15, 2006, Defendants moved pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) to dismiss the SAC, including claims by the putative class. The Court took this motion under submission and now renders its decision.
Plaintiff has also requested that the Court take judicial notice of certain California state court decisions.
I. LEGAL AND FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Plaintiff, a resident of New Jersey, alleges she bought bed…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Durell v. Sharp HealthcareCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Ries v. Arizona Beverages USA LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2012
- Hall v. Time Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2008
- Frenzel v. AliphcomDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
- Picus v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2009
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.