Legal Opinion
United Parcel Service, Petitioner/cross-Respondent v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent/cross-Petitioner
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided December 9, 1994No. 93-6354, 93-6461PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CONTIE, Circuit Judge.
United Parcel Service (“UPS”) seeks review and the National Labor Relations Board (“Board”) seeks enforcement of the Board’s Decision and Order finding that UPS violated the National Labor Relations Act (“Act”) by issuing a warning notice to a UPS driver who refused to remove a union insignia lapel pin from his uniform. We grant UPS’ petition for review, deny the Board’s cross-application for enforcement, and reverse the Board’s Decision and Order.
I
Petitioner UPS transports and delivers small packages worldwide. Approximately 1000 employees work at its operating center…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- East Tennessee Baptist Hospital, Petitioner/cross-Respondent v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent/cross-PetitionerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- National Labor Relations Board v. Okun Brothers Shoe Store, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
- National Labor Relations Board v. Homemaker Shops, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- Burger King Corporation v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
3Cited by17 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board, Petitioner/cross-Respondent v. St. Francis Healthcare Centre, Respondent/cross-PetitionerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- National Labor Relations Board v. The Mead Corporation D/B/A Escanaba Paper CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Guard Publishing Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
- Meijer, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Meijer, Inc., Petitioner/cross-Respondent v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent/cross-PetitionerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.