Hamburg v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KLINE, P. J.
INTRODUCTION
Appellants, who were conducting a protest at respondent Wal-Mart’s business premises in Ukiah, were arrested for trespass after they refused to leave. They commenced this action for false arrest and violation of constitutional rights against Wal-Mart and the store manager who made the arrests as a private person. (Pen. Code, § 837.) Respondents moved for summary judgment and the motion was granted by the trial court, which thereupon dismissed the complaint.
Relying upon Robins v. Pruneyard Shopping Center (1979) 23 Cal.3d 899 [153 Cal.Rptr. 854, 592 P.2d 341],…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Merrill v. Navegar, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Saelzler v. Advanced Group 400California Supreme Court · 2001
- Robins v. Pruneyard Shopping CenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Johnson v. City of Loma LindaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- In Re CoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Tekle Ex Rel. Tekle v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Hutton v. Fidelity National Title Co.California Court of Appeal · 2013
- Minish v. Hanuman FellowshipCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Meddock v. County of Yolo CA3California Court of Appeal · 2013
- Kesmodel v. RandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.