Legal Opinion

Hamburg v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 3, 2004No. A101829PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KLINE, P. J.

INTRODUCTION

Appellants, who were conducting a protest at respondent Wal-Mart’s business premises in Ukiah, were arrested for trespass after they refused to leave. They commenced this action for false arrest and violation of constitutional rights against Wal-Mart and the store manager who made the arrests as a private person. (Pen. Code, § 837.) Respondents moved for summary judgment and the motion was granted by the trial court, which thereupon dismissed the complaint.

Relying upon Robins v. Pruneyard Shopping Center (1979) 23 Cal.3d 899 [153 Cal.Rptr. 854, 592 P.2d 341],…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Merrill v. Navegar, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Saelzler v. Advanced Group 400California Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Robins v. Pruneyard Shopping CenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Johnson v. City of Loma LindaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  5. In Re CoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Tekle Ex Rel. Tekle v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  2. Hutton v. Fidelity National Title Co.California Court of Appeal · 2013
  3. Minish v. Hanuman FellowshipCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  4. Meddock v. County of Yolo CA3California Court of Appeal · 2013
  5. Kesmodel v. RandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API