Legal Opinion
Tekle Ex Rel. Tekle v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 3, 2007No. 04-55026PublishedCited by 128 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge TASHIMA: Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge FSHER; Concurrence by Judge KLEINFELD.
ORDER AND AMENDED OPINION
ORDER
Defendants-appellees’ petition for panel rehearing is granted. The opinion and Judge Kleinfeld’s opinion concurring the result filed on August 11, 2006, and reported at 457 F.3d 1088, are withdrawn and replaced by the amended opinion, Judge Fisher’s opinion concurring in part and concurring in the judgment, and Judge Kleinfeld’s opinion concurring in the result filed concurrently with this order.
The petition for rehearing en banc is denied as moot. No…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Hope v. PelzerSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by128 opinions
- Corales v. BennettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Liranzo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- Torres v. City of MaderaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Charles Byrd v. Phoenix Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- E.W. v. Rosemary DolgosCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018
123 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.