Legal Opinion

Green v. Smith

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 19, 1968No. Civ. 8689PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTamura, J.

Plaintiff, a wholesale grower of ornamental nursery trees brought this action for damages for crop loss allegedly sustained by him by reason of defendants’ destruction of a concrete irrigation pipeline. The complaint was in two counts—one based on intentional trespass and one on negligence. Following a nonjury trial the court found that defendants unlawfully and intentionally, though not maliciously, demolished the pipeline and that as a consequence plaintiff was unable to harvest nursery stock having an “alleged market value in excess of $17,000.” However, it found that plaintiff could have…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. American Enterprise, Inc. v. Van WinkleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Valencia v. Shell Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Hunter v. SparlingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  4. Joerger v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Autry v. Republic Productions, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1947

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. State Department of Health Services v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Jarchow v. Transamerica Title InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  3. OCM Principal Opportunities Fund, L.P. v. CIBC World Markets Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2007
  4. Intel Corp. v. Hartford Acc. and Indem. Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1988
  5. Powerhouse Motorsports Group, Inc. v. Yamaha Motor Corp., USACalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API