Legal Opinion
Mayes v. Sturdy Northern Sales, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 28, 1979No. Civ. 41990PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DEAL, J. *
Sturdy Northern Sales, Inc., Sturdy Dog Foods, Inc., Richard E. Walther, and Randy Walther appeal from a judgment in the net amount of $98,751, together with costs, in favor of respondent William J. Mayes.
On January 29, 1975, Mayes filed a complaint for damages against appellants; he alleged breach of a franchise agreement and conspiracy to destroy his business. Defendants answered with a general denial except for Sturdy Northern Sales, Inc.’s admission that it entered into the agreement and was bound thereby. Sturdy Northern filed a cross-complaint alleging that Mayes had…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Gruenberg v. Aetna InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- D'AMICO v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Ward v. TaggartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Davey v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
- Brewer v. SimpsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Applied Equipment Corp. v. Litton Saudi Arabia Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1994
- Seaman's Direct Buying Service, Inc. v. Standard Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1984
- Cleary v. American Airlines, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1980
- Davis & Cox, a Partnership, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Summa Corporation, Defendant-Appellant/cross-Appellee. Chester C. Davis, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Summa Corporation, Defendant-Appellant/cross-Appellee. Summa Corporation, Defendant-Counterclaimant/appellant v. Davis & Cox, a Partnership, Chester C. Davis, Maxwell E. Cox, Howard M. Jaffe and Martin Cook, Plaintiffs-Counterdefendants/appellees. Summa Corporation, Hughes Aircraft Corporation, Defendants- Counterclaimants/appellants v. Chester C. Davis, Davis & Cox, Maxwell E. Cox, Howard M. Jaffe and D. Martin Cook, Counterdefendants/appelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- 999, a Corporation, Plaintiff/appellee/cross-Appellant v. C.I.T. Corporation, a Corporation, Defendant/appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.