Legal Opinion

Kelley v. Russell

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 17, 1942No. Civ. 3012PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.

This is an appeal from a judgment for the plaintiffs in an action for specific performance.

The respondent Lillian Kelley was formerly the owner in fee of all of the. land here involved. On July 30, 1919, she conveyed about 900 acres of land in Kern County to one Anderson and, as a part of the same transaction, took back a lease on the same property giving her the right to explore for, develop and produce oil and other minerals therefrom during the term expiring July 30, 1939, without royalty or other payment to the lessor. The lease also provided that Miss Kelley should have the right, during…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cates v. McNeilCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Fleishman v. WoodsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Kofoed v. GordonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Lange v. WatersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Janssen v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. People v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  2. Presley of Southern California v. WhelanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  3. Reeves v. HutsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  4. Eldridge v. BurnsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  5. Real Estate Analytics, LLC v. VallasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API