Legal Opinion

Janssen v. Davis

California Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 1934No. Docket No. S.F. 14430PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This is an appeal from a judgment decreeing specific performance of a contract for the purchase and sale of a parcel of real property, together with the improvements thereon. The plaintiff is the vendor and defendant W. K. Davis is the vendee. Judgment was rendered in favor of defendant Emelie Davis and, inasmuch as plaintiff does not appeal, her rights are no longer involved.

The facts as disclosed by the record are as follows:

Plaintiff is a building contractor and the defendant is a real estate agent. Defendant, as agent, had sold certain property for plaintiff, as a result of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Carr v. HowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Pascoe v. MorrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Pacific Etc. Ry. Co. v. Campbell-JohnstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Jolliffe v. SteeleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
  5. Waldeck v. HeddenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. King v. StanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Long Beach Drug Co. v. United Drug Co.California Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Morgan v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Reed v. AlveyUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  5. O'Donnell v. LutterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API