Legal Opinion
Schmidt v. Beckelman
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 16, 1960No. Civ. 6354PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShepard, J.
W. E. Schmidt, as plaintiff, brought this action to have declared void a certain “Option to Purchase Mining Property” from plaintiff, as optionor, to defendants H. M. Beckelman, C. W. Moncrieff, Don O’Dell and Black-hawk Limestone Company, as optionees, and to quiet plaintiff’s title to property described in said option. Defendants filed a cross-complaint for damages for breach of the option contract. Judgment was rendered for cross-complainants on the cross-complaint for damages and against cross-defendant in the amount of $217,000. Plaintiff appeals.
Much of the material evidence as to the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Brewer v. SimpsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Anderson v. ThacherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Feckenscher v. GambleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Rattray v. ScudderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Vaughan v. RobertsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Schwartz v. ShapiroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- C. Robert Nattress & Associates v. CidcoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Oldenkott v. American Electric, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1971
- Arthur Cohn, and Michael Arthur Film Productions, a Company Doing Business Under the Laws of Liechtenstein v. Richard L. RosenfeldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Riverside Fence Co. v. NovakCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.