Legal Opinion
Bruss Co. v. Allnet Communication Services, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided April 4, 1985No. 84 C 3611PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
NORDBERG, District Judge.
This action is before the court on joint motion of all defendants to dismiss plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint. For the reasons set forth below, defendants’ motion is granted in part and denied in part.
Facts
Defendant Allnet Communication Services, Inc. (“Allnet”) is a provider of long distance telephone service. It is subject to the Federal Communications Act of 1934, 47 U.S.C. § 201 et seq., and to the rules, regulations, directions and orders of the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”). The individual defendants, Michael P.…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Cruz v. BetoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Brown v. General Services AdministrationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. Western Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Abilene Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Liquid Air Corp. v. RogersCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Rebecca J. Schofield v. First Commodity Corporation of Boston, Rebecca J. Schofield v. First Commodity Corporation of BostonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
- Kellerman v. MCI Telecommunications Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1986
- Tenore v. AT&T Wireless ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Rush v. Oppenheimer & Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.