Legal Opinion

CNL Hotels & Resorts, Inc. v. Maricopa County

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 2012No. CV-11-0072-PRPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRUTINEL, Justice.

¶ 1 Improvements on land leased from the state qualify for a reduced ad valorem tax rate if they “become the property of the ... state ... on termination of the leasehold interest in the property.” A.R.S. § 42-12009(A)(1)(a) (2009). We hold that this provision applies when, at the time of taxation, improvements exist on the land that, under the terms of the lease, would become the state’s property upon lease termination.

I

¶ 2 In 1993, the predecessor-in-interest to CNL Hotels and Resorts Inc. (“CNL”) entered into two ninety-nine year leases of state trust land to build…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hayes v. Continental InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Maricopa County v. Corporation Commission of Ariz.Arizona Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Santanello v. CooperArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  4. City of Phoenix v. YarnellArizona Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Turken v. GordonArizona Supreme Court · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Gila River Indian Community v. Department of Child SafetyArizona Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Roberts v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2021
  3. Scottsdale/101 Associates, LLC v. Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
  4. Champlin Stopinski, Skipton and Assoc. v. Bank of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
  5. Scottsdale Princess Partnership v. Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API