Turken v. Gordon
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HURWITZ, Vice Chief Justice.
¶ 1 The issue for decision is whether an agreement by the City of Phoenix to pay a developer as much as $97.4 million for the use of garage parking spaces violates the Gift Clause, Ariz. Const, art. 9, § 7. Although we conclude that the agreement quite likely violates the Gift Clause, because language in our previous opinions could well have led the City to conclude that the agreement was constitutional, we today clarify our Gift Clause jurisprudence and apply bur decision prospectively only.
I
A
¶2 CityNorth is the proposed commercial core of Desert Ridge, a…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Wagenseller v. Scottsdale Memorial HospitalArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Schade v. DiethrichArizona Supreme Court · 1988
- Lowing v. Allstate InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1993
- Kotterman v. KillianArizona Supreme Court · 1999
- Fain Land & Cattle Co. v. HassellArizona Supreme Court · 1990
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Haugland v. City of BismarckNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- CNL Hotels & Resorts, Inc. v. Maricopa CountyArizona Supreme Court · 2012
- cheatham/huey v. Diciccio/phoenix Law Enforcement AssociationArizona Supreme Court · 2016
- Darcie Schires v. Cathy CarlatArizona Supreme Court · 2021
- Ulrich v. Walker (In Re Boates)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.