Scottsdale Princess Partnership v. Maricopa County
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HALL, Judge.
¶ 1 Scottsdale Princess Partnership (Taxpayer) challenges Maricopa County’s classification of the Fairmont Scottsdale Princess Resort land and improvements (the Property) as Class One property under Arizona
Revised Statutes (A.R.S.) section 42-12001(12) (2003). Taxpayer contends that the Property qualifies for Class Nine status under A.R.S. § 42-12009(A)(l)(b) (2003) because it is used primarily for convention activities. The tax court upheld the Class One classification, which applies to commercial and industrial properties. Based on a fair reading of the statute, we affirm…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Kilpatrick v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1970
- State Ex Rel. Department of Revenue v. Capitol Castings, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 2004
- State Tax Commission v. PeckArizona Supreme Court · 1970
- Arizona Department of Revenue v. Ormond Builders, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- Arizona Department of Revenue v. RabyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Scottsdale/101 Associates, LLC v. Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015