Legal Opinion

Scottsdale Princess Partnership v. Maricopa County

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided October 4, 2012No. 1 CA-TX 10-0004PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HALL, Judge.

¶ 1 Scottsdale Princess Partnership (Taxpayer) challenges Maricopa County’s classification of the Fairmont Scottsdale Princess Resort land and improvements (the Property) as Class One property under Arizona

Revised Statutes (A.R.S.) section 42-12001(12) (2003). Taxpayer contends that the Property qualifies for Class Nine status under A.R.S. § 42-12009(A)(l)(b) (2003) because it is used primarily for convention activities. The tax court upheld the Class One classification, which applies to commercial and industrial properties. Based on a fair reading of the statute, we affirm…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Kilpatrick v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  2. State Ex Rel. Department of Revenue v. Capitol Castings, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State Tax Commission v. PeckArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Arizona Department of Revenue v. Ormond Builders, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  5. Arizona Department of Revenue v. RabyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Scottsdale/101 Associates, LLC v. Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API