Legal Opinion

Scottsdale/101 Associates, LLC v. Maricopa County

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 29, 2015No. 1 CA-TX 14-0003, 1 CA-TX 14-0008, 1 CA-TX 14-0011, 1 CA-TX 14-0012PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CATTANI, Judge:

¶ 1 This consolidated appeal involves a challenge to the property tax classification of properties located on state-owned land. The tax court granted summary judgment in favor of Appellee Maricopa County, concluding that the County properly assessed the properties as shopping centers. For reasons that follow, we conclude that the properties may qualify for mixed-use assessment, and we thus reverse and remand to the tax court for further proceedings consistent with this decision.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

¶ 2 The properties in question are commercial developments…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wilderness World, Inc. v. Department of RevenueArizona Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State Ex Rel. Department of Revenue v. Capitol Castings, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 2004
  3. People's Choice TV Corp. v. City of TucsonArizona Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Nordstrom, Inc. v. Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  5. Aileen H. Char Life Interest v. Maricopa CountyArizona Supreme Court · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sundevil Power Holdings, LLC v. Arizona Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
  2. SolarCity Corp. v. Arizona Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
  3. Qasimyar v. MaricopaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2021
  4. Sundevil Power Holdings, LLC v. Arizona Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API