Legal Opinion

Markstrom v. Guard Publ'g Co.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 10, 2018No. A163317PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOrtega, P. J.

*339Plaintiff appeals a general judgment of dismissal, which the trial court entered as a sanction for spoliation of evidence-specifically, destruction of plaintiff's email and text messages. Even though plaintiff deleted most or all of the material in question before filing her cause of action, the trial court ultimately concluded-relying on ORCP 46 D, a rule governing sanctions for discovery violations, and related case law, namely Pamplin v. Victoria , 319 Or. 429, 877 P.2d 1196 (1994) -that, because plaintiff knew when she destroyed the emails and text messages that "litigation was reasonably…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pamplin v. VictoriaOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  2. McCollum v. KMART CORP.Oregon Supreme Court · 2010
  3. McCollum v. Kmart Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  4. Qui Phu Phan v. MorrowCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Markstrom v. Guard Publishing Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  2. Kerr v. Board of Psychologist ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  3. Noor and ChowdhuryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API