Markstrom v. Guard Publ'g Co.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtOrtega, P. J.
*339Plaintiff appeals a general judgment of dismissal, which the trial court entered as a sanction for spoliation of evidence-specifically, destruction of plaintiff's email and text messages. Even though plaintiff deleted most or all of the material in question before filing her cause of action, the trial court ultimately concluded-relying on ORCP 46 D, a rule governing sanctions for discovery violations, and related case law, namely Pamplin v. Victoria , 319 Or. 429, 877 P.2d 1196 (1994) -that, because plaintiff knew when she destroyed the emails and text messages that "litigation was reasonably…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Pamplin v. VictoriaOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- McCollum v. KMART CORP.Oregon Supreme Court · 2010
- McCollum v. Kmart Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- Qui Phu Phan v. MorrowCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
3Cited by3 opinions
- Markstrom v. Guard Publishing Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
- Kerr v. Board of Psychologist ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
- Noor and ChowdhuryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023