Legal Opinion
McCollum v. KMART CORP.
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided February 19, 2010No. CC0506-06750; CA A134457; SC S057609PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLinder, J.
This is a personal injury case in which defendant appealed an order granting plaintiff a new trial. The Court of Appeals determined that the trial court’s stated grounds for ordering a new trial, as well as certain alternative grounds urged by plaintiff to support the order, were not adequate bases for that relief. McCollum v. Kmart Corporation, 228 Or App 101, 207 P3d 1200 (2009) {McCollum II). The Court of Appeals therefore reversed the trial court’s order and remanded with instructions to reinstate the judgment for defendant. Id. at 123.
Plaintiff has filed a petition for review of the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Gillespie v. KononenOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- Propp v. LongOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- Charco, Inc. v. CohnOregon Supreme Court · 1966
- Beardsley v. HillOregon Supreme Court · 1959
- Nendel v. MeyersOregon Supreme Court · 1939
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Strawn v. Farmers Ins. Co. of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. RamozOregon Supreme Court · 2021
- Sjomeling v. LasserCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
- State v. RamozCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
- Markstrom v. Guard Publ'g Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.