Principal Life Insurance Company and Subsidiaries v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ALLEGRA, Judge:
“[T]he tax could not be escaped by anticipatory arranyements and contracts however skillfully devised ... by which the fruits are attributed to a different tree from that on which they yrew.” 1
Before the court, on cross-motions for partial summary judgment, is the next leg of this complex tax refund suit. 2 At issue is the tax treatment of two distinct, but structurally-similar, series of investments made by Principal Life Insurance Company and Subsidiaries (PLIC). Eight of these investments related to so-called “custodial share receipts” or “CSRs,” while three others…
2Cases cited123 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
118 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Lippmann v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Barlow v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Estes Express Lines v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Langkamp v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Kingman Reef Atoll Investments, L.L.C. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.