Legal Opinion

Principal Life Insurance Company and Subsidiaries v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided May 9, 2014No. 1:07-cv-00006PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ALLEGRA, Judge:

“[T]he tax could not be escaped by anticipatory arranyements and contracts however skillfully devised ... by which the fruits are attributed to a different tree from that on which they yrew.” 1

Before the court, on cross-motions for partial summary judgment, is the next leg of this complex tax refund suit. 2 At issue is the tax treatment of two distinct, but structurally-similar, series of investments made by Principal Life Insurance Company and Subsidiaries (PLIC). Eight of these investments related to so-called “custodial share receipts” or “CSRs,” while three others…

2Cases cited123 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944

118 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Lippmann v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
  2. Barlow v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  3. Estes Express Lines v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  4. Langkamp v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
  5. Kingman Reef Atoll Investments, L.L.C. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API