Legal Opinion
Langkamp v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided March 20, 2017No. 15-764CPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Motion for Summary Judgment; RCFC 56; Breach of Contract; Annuity.
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
GRIGGSBY, Judge
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff, Trevor Langkamp, brought this breach of contract matter alleging that the government breached a stipulation for compromise settlement that his parents entered into with the United States to resolve a personal injury lawsuit brought on his behalf (the “Settlement Agreement”). Plaintiff and the government have filed cross-motions for summary judgment on the issue of liability, pursuant to Rule 56 of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Langkamp v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
- Shaw v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Hendrickson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Langkamp v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018