Barlow v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
Rails-to-Trails; Fifth Amendment .Takings; National Trails System Act; Illinois Law; Fee Simple; Easement; Notice of Interim Trail Use (NITU)
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
LYDIA KAY GRIGGSBY, Judge
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs, landowners who own property adjacent to a railroad line owned by the Union Pacific Railroad Company, brought this takings action against the United States pursuant to the National Trails System Act, 16 U.S.C. §§ 1241-51 (2012). Plaintiffs allege a Fifth Amendment takings of their reversionary interest in property underlying the railroad line right-of-way, as a result of the…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Preseault v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Chicago Coating Company, LLC v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
- James v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Barlow v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2023
- Chicago Coating Company, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Harley-White v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.