Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Insurance Commissioner
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Craig,
We are required to decide if the. Insurance Commissioner exceeded his statutory authority in disapproving the use of sex as a classification basis for automobile insurance rate differentials, under the Casualty and Surety Rate Regulatory Act of 1947 (Rate Act), Act of June 11, 1947, P.L. 538, 40 P.S. §§1181-1199.1
After the Insurance Department had earlier approved a rate classification plan filed on behalf of Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, Philip V. Mattes, the intervening appellee here, filed a complaint under Section 5(b) of the Rate Act, 40 P.S. § 1185(b),…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Conway v. DanaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Commonwealth v. ButlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Henderson v. HendersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- DiFlorido v. DiFloridoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Commonwealth v. Pennsylvania Interscholastic Athletic Ass'nCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Insurance Commissioner of CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Bartholomew Ex Rel. Bartholomew v. FosterCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Dillon v. HOMEOWNER'S SELECT, AFFINITY INS. SERVICES, INC.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Fischer v. Department of Public WelfareCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. BrowneCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.