Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Insurance Commissioner of Commonwealth
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
*575OPINION
NIX, Chief Justice.
In this appeal we have agreed to review the Commonwealth Court’s affirmance of an order of the Insurance Commissioner of Pennsylvania (“Commissioner”) rescinding his prior approval of Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company’s (“Hartford”) gender-based automobile insurance rates on the ground they were “unfairly discriminatory” under section 3(d) of the Casualty and Surety Rate Regulation Act (“Rate Act”), Act of June 11, 1947, P.L. 538, § 3(d), 40 P.S. § 1183(d)(1971). After careful consideration we have concluded that the Commissioner’s action was both within his…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Spriggs v. CarsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Daly v. HemphillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Conway v. DanaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Commonwealth v. ButlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Masland v. BachmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Robinson Township v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Weaver v. HarpsterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Fischer v. Department of Public WelfareSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Sarah Anne Williams Wayne Williams, on Behalf of Their Minor Son, John Williams v. The School District of Bethlehem, PaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Coffman v. Wilson Police DepartmentDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.