Commonwealth v. Butler
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Me. Justice Robeets,
This case presents a significant question of the facial constitutionality of the legislative response to our decision in Commonwealth v. Daniel, 430 Pa. 642, 243 A.2d 400 (1968). We agree with appellant that the Commonwealth’s sentencing statutes — the Act of 1911 and the so-called new Muncy Act — by their joint operation are constitutionally impermissible. We disagree, however, that the Act of 1911 must be struck down. Instead, we hold unconstitutional that portion of the new Muncy Act directing that no minimum sentence be imposed on women convicted of crime.…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Bell v. BursonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by105 opinions
- Commonwealth v. EdmundsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Stanton v. StantonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Commonwealth v. Batts, Q., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Robinson Township v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Rivenbark v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
100 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.