Legal Opinion
California Air Resources Board v. Hart
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 22, 1993No. B068690PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KLEIN, P. J.
Plaintiff and appellant California Air Resources Board (the Board) appeals the judgment of dismissal entered in favor of defendant and respondent Lawrence T. Hart, individually and doing business as' Bellflower Harley-Davidson (Hart), on the ground the Board is without standing to sue in this matter.
Because Health and Safety Code sections 7 and 43154, subdivision (b), 1 construed in light of Government Code section 11040, permit the Attorney General to delegate in writing to the Board’s legal counsel the power to prosecute the instant civil action against Hart, the judgment…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- D'AMICO v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Moyer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- California Teachers Ass'n v. San Diego Community College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- Burden v. SnowdenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Klopstock v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Mattco Forge, Inc. v. Arthur Young & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1997
- Branick v. Downey Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- Citizens for Open Access to Sand and Tide, Inc. v. Seadrift Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Cloud v. Northrop Grumman Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1998
- In re StierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.