Legal Opinion
Branick v. Downey Savings & Loan Ass'n
California Supreme Court
Decided July 24, 2006No. S132433PublishedCited by 97 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WERDEGAR, J.
In the companion case of Californians for Disability Rights v. Mervyn’s LLC, (2006) 39 Cal.4th 223 [46 Cal.Rptr.3d 57, 138 P.3d 207] (CDR), we hold that Proposition 64 (Gen. Elec. (Nov. 2, 2004)), which limited standing to sue under California’s statutory unfair competition and false advertising laws (Bus. & Prof. Code, 1 §§ 17200 et seq., 17500 et seq.; see §§ 17203, 17204, 17535), governs pending cases. We granted review in this case to decide whether plaintiffs, whose standing Proposition 64 has revoked, may amend their complaint to substitute a new plaintiff who does…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Illinois Brick Co. v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Norgart v. Upjohn Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
- Committee on Children's Television, Inc. v. General Foods Corp.California Supreme Court · 1983
- Bertero v. National General Corp.California Supreme Court · 1974
- Rusheen v. CohenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by97 opinions
- Kwikset Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- In Re Tobacco II CasesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- Troyk v. Farmers Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
- Daniels v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2016
- Nguyen v. FXCM Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.