Legal Opinion

Gibson v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided September 26, 1986No. 697-85CPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

LYDON, Judge:

This case comes before the court on plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment and defendant's Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, its Cross-motion for Summary Judgment. At issue is whether plaintiff was eligible to participate in the Department of Agriculture’s “Payment-In-Kind” (PIK) Program for 1983. The PIK program was conducted in accordance with the Agricultural Act of 1949, as amended, 7 U.S.C. § 1421 et seq. (1982) and the Commodity Credit Corporation Charter Act, as amended, 15 U.S.C. § 714 et seq. (1982) and Department of Agriculture implementing…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United States v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. United States v. Pierce Auto Freight Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Aircraft & Diesel Equipment Corp. v. HirschSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. Carruth v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Hedman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1988
  2. Elmer T. Wilson, Sr. And Maxine Wilson v. United States Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
  3. Grav v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1988
  4. Raines v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1987
  5. Martin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API