Legal Opinion
Grav v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided March 4, 1988No. 716-85CPublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SMITH, Chief Judge.
The plaintiffs, Peter and Arlene Grav, seek relief from a decision of the Secretary of Agriculture, through the Commodity Credit Corporation, denying them participation in the Milk Diversion Program. 7 U.S.C. § 1446(d) (Supp. 11983). The merits of the case are currently before the court on the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment. Prior to oral argument on the motions for summary judgment, however, the court asked for briefs and oral argument on the question of whether this court could exercise jurisdiction. Pursuant to this request the defendant submitted a…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- United States, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. John C. Grimberg Co., Inc. And W.M. Schlosser Co., Inc., Appellees/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Carruth v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- American Bankers Association v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
- Peter G. Grav, Arlene L. Grav, and the First National Bank in Sioux Falls v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- ARRA Energy Co. I v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Land of Lincoln Mutual Health Insurance Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Baker v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.