Legal Opinion
Martin v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided June 29, 1990No. 558-88CPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LYDON, Senior Judge:
This case is before the court on the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment. At issue is whether plaintiff violated the terms of his contract with the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). The parties entered into the contract pursuant to the Diary Termination Program (DTP), which was enacted as part of the Food Security Act of 1985, 7 U.S.C. § 1446(d) (Supp. V 1987).1 Plaintiff’s complaint challenges a determination by the USDA’s Deputy Administrator for State and County Operations (DASCO) that plaintiff is no longer eligible to receive compensation…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Clearfield Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Carruth v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Nasa v. FlraSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Doty v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
- CEMS, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- Dart Advantage Warehousing, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- Viromed Laboratories, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.