Legal Opinion
Stinnett v. United States
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Decided September 4, 2012No. Civil No. 3:12-cv-00114PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
ALETA A. TRAUGER, District Judge.
The government has filed a Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 5), with respect to which the plaintiff filed a Response in opposition (Docket No. 11), the government filed a Reply (Docket No. 15), the plaintiffs filed a Sur-Reply (Docket No. 22), and the government filed a Sur-Sur-Reply (Docket No. 25). For the reasons set forth herein, the Motion to Dismiss will be granted and Stinnett’s case will be dismissed without prejudice.
BACKGROUND1
Plaintiff Kerry Stinnett, a Tennessee resident, is a Vietnam veteran who underwent a colonoscopy at the United States…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Eiswert v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2018
- Donzel Hawkins v. State of Tennessee, ET AL.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2026
- Widmann v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2025