Legal Opinion

Widmann v. United States

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided March 27, 2025No. 2:24-cv-00025Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WILLIAM CHARLES WIDMANN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No.: 2:24-CV-25-TAV-CRW ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on defendant’s motion to dismiss [Doc. 7]. Defendant seeks dismissal pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6). Plaintiff has responded [Doc. 12], defendant has replied [Doc. 13], and therefore, the motion is ripe for review. For the reasons set forth below, defendant’s motion to dismiss [Doc. 7] is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Arizona v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2012

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API