Legal Opinion

Hyundai Motor America v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 20, 2015No. G051279PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THE COURT. *

“Nature, not judges, should be in charge of making mountains out of mole hills.” (Crum v. City of Stockton (1979) 96 Cal.App.3d 519, 524 [157 Cal.Rptr. 823] (cone. & dis. opn. of Reynoso, J.).)

This writ petition came to this court on a request by petitioner Hyundai Motor America (Hyundai) to stay a scheduled judgment debtor examination of its president and chief executive officer over a dispute regarding an attempt by real party in interest Adam Rosen (Rosen) to collect supposed postjudgment interest of $462.50 on an attorney fee award of $42,203.

Hyundai promptly paid the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Palma v. U.S. Industrial Fasteners, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Lewis v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Ng v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Wohlgemuth v. Caterpillar Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012
  5. Pellegrini v. WeissCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Gilman v. DalbyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
  2. Gilman v. DalbyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
  3. Madrigal v. Hyundai Motor AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023
  4. Madrigal v. Hyundai Motor AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023
  5. Madrigal v. Hyundai Motor AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API