Legal Opinion

United States v. Jeremy Eugene Staffeldt Orlando Leon Pastrano Lincoln Clarence Metzgar John Anthony Gonzales

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 26, 2006No. 05-10243PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:

The United States appeals an order of the district court granting a motion to suppress evidence obtained by means of a wiretap of two cellular phones belonging to Jeremy Staffeldt, one of the defendants. The district court found that the wiretap application was “facially insufficient,” one of the three grounds for suppressing evidence under the statute governing the authorization of wiretaps, Title III of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (“Act”). The application, which sought an order to wiretap Staf-feldt’s phones, included as an exhibit a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. GiordanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. United States v. ChavezSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. United States v. Richard Michael King, AKA Richard HansenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
  4. United States v. Anthony Joseph AconCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
  5. United States v. Howard Arthur SwannCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States v. LyonsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
  2. United States v. GrayCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  3. United States v. Azano MatsuraDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2015
  4. State v. SalazarCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
  5. United States v. Michael CareyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API