Legal Opinion

United States v. Azano Matsura

District Court, S.D. California

Decided September 11, 2015No. Case No. 14cr388-MMAPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AFFIRMING TENTATIVE RULINGS;

DENYING DEFENDANTS AZANO AND SINGH’S MOTIONS TO SUPPRESS WIRETAP EVIDENCE

MICHAEL M. ANELLO, District Judge.

In June 2013, a district judge in the Southern District of California authorized the interception of wire communications of retired San Diego Police Detective Ernesto Encinas, as well as electronic communications to and from a cellular telephone used by Encinas. Defendants Jose Susumo Azano Matsura (“Azano”) and Ravneet Singh (“Singh”) move to suppress all evidence of communications intercepted over Encinas’ cell phoné, as well as any evidence derived…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Alderman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. United States v. David Taketa and Thomas O'BrienCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  3. United States v. Jose M. Cruz JimenezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  4. United States v. Richard Michael King, AKA Richard HansenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
  5. United States v. Louis J. Cella, Jr., Stephen R. Evans, Theodore Schiffman, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State of Maine v. Kevin M. O'DonnellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2019
  2. United States v. GloverDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API