Legal Opinion
United States v. Howard Arthur Swann
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 19, 1975No. 73--1723PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Before KOELSCH and BROWNING, Circuit Judges, and KELLEHER, * District Judge. PER CURIAM:
The government appeals from an order of the district court suppressing evidence derived from wiretaps approved by prior court orders dated September 13, 1971, October 26, 1971, and November 12, 1971, on the ground that the Department of Justice failed to comply (1) with the requirement of 18 U.S.C. § 2516(1) that an application for a wiretap order be authorized by the Attorney General himself, or by an Assistant Attorney General specially designated by the Attorney General, and (2) with the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. ChavezSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- United States v. John Joseph, Bryan Roberts, Milton Kothman, Victor Ganem, Richard DickCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Anthony Joseph AconCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Betty Erdman, United States of America v. Orlando James Vigi, United States of America v. Dave Palmer and Nick Frank FloweryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- United States v. Cara Woods, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. VentoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Eric J. Moore Craig C. Robinson Ray L. Williams Keith L. Cooks Lashonda R. Robinson Sherice Y. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. GrayCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. RadcliffCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.