Legal Opinion
State v. Salazar
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided March 28, 2013No. Nos. 1 CA-CR 12-0167, 1 CA-CR 12-0170, 1 CA-CR 12-0171, 1 CA-CR 12-0184PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWANN, Judge.
¶ 1 The State of Arizona appeals the trial court’s suppression of evidence obtained through a wiretap. We hold that an application for wiretap must satisfy the literal requirements of A.R.S. § 13-3010. Because the application in this case did not contain the applicant’s sworn statement of supporting facts as required by that statute, we affirm the trial court’s suppression order.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
¶ 2 The state indicted Appellees Salazar, Trejo, Ramirez and Solorzano for felony offenses related to drug possession, sale or trafficking, and gang activity. Appellees…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. GiordanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- State v. SpearsArizona Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. GrantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- State v. MangumCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- United States v. Jeremy Eugene Staffeldt Orlando Leon Pastrano Lincoln Clarence Metzgar John Anthony GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Pinal Cnty. v. FullerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018