Legal Opinion

People v. Roach

California Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1900No. Crim. No. 608PublishedCited by 12 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

CHIPMAN, C.

Information for assault with intent to commit rape. The jury returned a verdict of guilty as charged in the information, and judgment was entered thereon that defendant be imprisoned at Folsom for the term of eight years. The appeal is from the judgment and from the order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial.

1. It is contended that the verdict was contrary to the evidence. It appears that the alleged assault was upon a girl under the age of fourteen years and hence under the age of consent.

Defendant claims that the evidence fails to bring the case within the rule laid down in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. CourierMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  2. People v. FlemingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. People v. VerdegreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  4. State v. ShermanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. GarneyIdaho Supreme Court · 1928
  2. People v. BabcockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Ross v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1908
  4. People v. ParkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  5. People v. WooleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API