Legal Opinion

State v. Sherman

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 15, 1898PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from Cass District Court. — Hon. N. W. Macy, Judge. Indictment for rape on a female under tbe age of thirteen years. Verdict of guilty and a judgment thereon. The defendant appealed.-

1Opinion of the CourtGranger, J.

1

*6872 *685I. When the indictment was returned the “age of consent” was thirteen instead of fifteen years, as at present. The court instructed the jury on the question of an assault with intent to commit rape, as being included in the crime charged in the indictment, and of -this complaint is made, it not appearing that defendant had actual knowledge of the age of the prosecutrix; and appellant’s claim is that there must not only be the intent to commit rape, but it must be intent to do so on a female under the age of thirteen years. A female under the age of thirteen years is not competent to consent…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. CarnagySupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
  2. State v. CaterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
  3. State v. NewtonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876
  4. State v. GrossheimSupreme Court of Iowa · 1890

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. JonesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1925
  2. State v. RobySupreme Court of Iowa · 1922
  3. Heath v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Ross v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1908
  5. State v. BrooksSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API