Legal Opinion
People v. Wooley
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 29, 1936No. Crim. 1496PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.
The defendant was convicted of an offense specified in section 285 of the Penal Code. His motion for new trial having been denied, this appeal is prosecuted from the order denying the motion for new trial, and from the judgment following the verdict of conviction. The sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict is not questioned. There is presented for our consideration certain alleged errors committed by the trial court hearing the action, and misconduct on the part of the district attorney, which we will consider in the following order:
At about 9 :47 P. M., after the jury had been…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Burton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Brasfield v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- People v. TalkingtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- People v. Von BadenthalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- People v. D'A PhilippoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- People v. SavageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Lugo Figueroa v. Tribunal Superior de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1970
- People v. CaradineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- In Re ChapmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- People v. HernandezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.