Henderson Cotton Mills v. Local Union No. 584, Textile Workers Union of America
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.
Respondent has brought forward and discussed in his brief two of his four assignments of error appearing in the record.
Assignments of error Numbers Two and Four are not set out in his brief, and in support of them no reason or argument is stated or authority cited. They are taken as abandoned by respondent. Rule 28, Rules of Practice in the Supreme Count. 221 N.C. 544, 563; S. v. Clayton, ante, 261, 111 S.E. 2d 299.
His -assignment of error Number One is, he excepts to the findings of fact and conclusions of law of Judge Mallard finding him -in wilful contempt of court, and he excepte to the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- City of Hickory v. Catawba CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
- Harriet Cotton Mills v. Local Union No. 578, Textile Workers Union of AmericaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- Kovacs v. BrewerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Young v. . RollinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
- Weaver v. MorganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. TrimbleNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- Harriet Cotton Mills v. Local Union No. 578, Textile Workers Union of AmericaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959