Legal Opinion

Harriet Cotton Mills v. Local Union No. 578, Textile Workers Union of America

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 25, 1959No. 385PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRodmaN, J.

The exception quoted in the statement of facts is the ■ only one appearing in the record. Nonetheless, appellants, in the assignments of error, attempt to break this single exception into four parts and refer to four exceptions.

The single exception is broadside. It does not draw into focus any particular finding of fact. It deprives this Court of that assistance it is rightfully entitled to expect if 'an appellant seriously intends to challenge the sufficiency of the evidence to support the findings of fact. It does not challenge the 'admissibility of tire evidence on which the findings are…

2Cases cited59 opinions

  1. Michel v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. In Re OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Affronti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  5. Neal v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1881

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. A-S-P Associates v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. Lowder v. All Star Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  3. Matter of Alamance County Ct. FacilitiesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  4. State v. GaitenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  5. Shepherd v. ShepherdSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API