Legal Opinion

Weaver v. Morgan

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 22, 1950No. 382PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiNBORNE, J.

The exception in the case in hand is “to the foregoing-findings of fact and judgment.” This, as to findings of fact, is a broadside exception. It fails to point out and designate the particular findings of fact to which exception is taken, and it is insufficient to challenge the sufficiency of the evidence to support the findings, or any one or more of them. Vestal v. Machine Co., 219 N.C. 468, 14 S.E. 2d 427.

When it is claimed that findings of fact made by the trial judge are not supported by evidence, the exceptions and assignments of error in relation thereto must specifically and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Town of Burnsville v. BooneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. Fox v. Cramerton Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  3. Vestal v. Moseley Vending MacHine Exchange, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  4. Culbreth v. Britt Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  5. Terry v. Capital Ice & Coal Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1949

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In Re BlalockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  2. Childress v. Johnson Motor Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  3. Worsley v. S. &. W. Rendering Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  4. In Re Sams'estateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  5. Carolina Scenic Stages v. LowtherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API