City of Hickory v. Catawba County
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.
The defendants entered a general exception to the judgment and to the judge’s findings of fact. As to the judgment, the exception points out no specific error and we find no irregularity on the face of the record (Dixon v. Osborne, 201 N. C., 489); and as to the facts, the exception is too indefinite to bring up for review the findings of the trial court. Boyer v. Jarrell, 180 N. C., 419; Sturtevant v. Cotton Mills, 171 N. C., 119; Riddick v. Farmers’ Assn., 132 N. C., 118.
Tbe appellants excepted to the court’s refusal to find certain additional facts, but in this respect, also, the ruling is…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Lowery v. School Trustees.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
- Gunter v. Town of SanfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
- Elliott v. State Board of EqualizationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
- Dixon v. . OsborneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- Pickett v. Carolina & Northwestern RailwaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Rader v. Queen City Coach Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- Matter of Alamance County Ct. FacilitiesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
- Town of Burnsville v. BooneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Mullen v. Town of LouisburgSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- King v. BaldwinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.