Legal Opinion

Harriet Cotton Mills v. Local Union No. 578, Textile Workers Union of America

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 16, 1959PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPaeKbr, J.

Respondents have filed a joint brief. In their brief they have brought forward and discussed only two of their four assignments of error -appearing in the record.

Assignments of error Numbers Two and Four are not-' set out in their brief, -and in -support of them no reason or argument is. -stated or .authority cited. They are taken .as abandoned -by respondents. Rule 28, Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court. 221 N.C. 544, 563; S. v. Clayton, ante, 261, 111 S.E. 2d 299.

Respondents’ assignment of error Number One is: Respondents except to the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. City of Hickory v. Catawba CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  2. Harriet Cotton Mills v. Local Union No. 578, Textile Workers Union of AmericaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  3. Young v. . RollinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
  4. Weaver v. MorganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  5. State v. ClaytonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. City of Kings Mountain v. ClineSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  2. Brenkworth v. LanierSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API