Harriet Cotton Mills v. Local Union No. 578, Textile Workers Union of America
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtPaeKbr, J.
Respondents have filed a joint brief. In their brief they have brought forward and discussed only two of their four assignments of error -appearing in the record.
Assignments of error Numbers Two and Four are not-' set out in their brief, -and in -support of them no reason or argument is. -stated or .authority cited. They are taken .as abandoned -by respondents. Rule 28, Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court. 221 N.C. 544, 563; S. v. Clayton, ante, 261, 111 S.E. 2d 299.
Respondents’ assignment of error Number One is: Respondents except to the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- City of Hickory v. Catawba CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
- Harriet Cotton Mills v. Local Union No. 578, Textile Workers Union of AmericaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- Young v. . RollinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
- Weaver v. MorganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- State v. ClaytonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- City of Kings Mountain v. ClineSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Brenkworth v. LanierSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963