Legal Opinion
Davis v. Stulman
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 20, 1945No. Civ. 14820PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOX, J. pro tem.
This is an appeal by defendant Jennie Miller Stulman from an adverse judgment in an action for declaratory relief.
The contract in question, dated November 19, 1941, was executed by plaintiff D. A. Davis as the first party, defendant Stulman as the second party, defendant Nathaniel A. Davis as the third party, and defendant Estelle Davis as the fourth party. Plaintiff D. A. Davis is the father of defendant Nathaniel A. Davis, and will therefore be referred to herein as the elder Davis while Nathaniel will be designated as the younger Davis. The Hollywood State Bank, which…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
- Kennedy v. IsenbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Peri v. L.A. Junction Ry.California Supreme Court · 1943
- Medico-Dental Building Co. v. Horton & ConverseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Hotaling v. HotalingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Silver v. ShemanskiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Hayward Lumber & Investment Co. v. Construction Products Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1953
- Arsenian v. MeketarianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Ferlito v. CesareCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Townsend v. WinglerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.